In brief

• Radio Wnet reported that KPRM employees were sent to remote work and told to leave the building.
• The claim that all staff were affected comes from a single broadcast and is not confirmed by the government.
• Some outlets used the term evacuation, but no official reason has been given.

Staff told to leave the Chancellery building

According to Radio Wnet, employees of the Chancellery of the Prime Minister (KPRM) in Warsaw have been told to leave the building and work remotely (Budynek KPRM ma być pusty. Pracownicy wysłani na pracę zdalną | Niezalezna.pl – niezalezna.pl). The same report says staff were asked to finish only the most urgent tasks before leaving the premises.

The broadcast describes the instruction as applying to all staff in the office. That account has not been independently verified, and the scope of the measure remains unclear. The instruction was reportedly passed on to employees on the morning of 3 November (Niepokojące informacje! Tusk kazał ewakuować się pracownikom KPRM? – wpolityce.pl). Some outlets have described the situation as an evacuation of the building, a term used in several headlines ("Rząd ewakuuje pracowników". Niepokojące doniesienia – Do Rzeczy) (Czystki i panika. Niepokojące doniesienia z KPRM: urzędnicy odesłani do domów! – wPolsce24).

Reactions and unanswered questions

Opposition-leaning media framed the move as unusual and raised concerns about a possible purge or a sudden change in the office's work. Media that carried the story asked whether Prime Minister Donald Tusk had ordered the change personally, but the accounts available so far do not confirm who made the decision or why (Czy Tusk wysłał pracowników Kancelarii na pracę zdalną? Pojawiły się niepokojące informacje – wm.pl).

The reports do not say how long the remote arrangement will last, how many people are affected, or whether any security threat prompted it. Until the Chancellery or the government comments, these details remain unconfirmed.

What comes next

The story rests on a single broadcast report that other outlets picked up and repeated. Readers should expect an official statement from the government to clarify the scope and reason for the measure.